The courtroom saga of two industry giants, IndiGo Airlines and Mahindra Electric Automobile Limited, has gripped the attention of legal experts and brand enthusiasts alike. At the heart of the dispute lies the seemingly innocuous alphanumeric combination “6E,” which IndiGo claims as a cornerstone of its brand identity. Mahindra, on the other hand, is attempting to introduce its new electric car, the Mahindra BE 6E, sparking a heated legal contest.
The Beginning of a Legal Showdown
On a routine Tuesday in Delhi, the stakes rose as IndiGo filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Mahindra Electric in the Delhi High Court. The airline accused the automotive company of unlawfully using “6E” in the branding of its new electric vehicle. The Mahindra BE 6E, which promises cutting-edge technology and is expected to launch in February 2025, has become the focal point of a fierce legal battle.
The initial hearing, presided over by a judge who eventually recused themselves, is now scheduled for December 9, 2024. In the interim, Mahindra reached out to IndiGo in an attempt to resolve the matter amicably. However, the court filings make it clear that IndiGo is unwilling to compromise its claim over the mark.
The Importance of “6E” to IndiGo
For IndiGo Airlines, “6E” is more than a callsign—it is the very essence of its identity. Since its inception, IndiGo has meticulously crafted the 6E brand to represent convenience, reliability, and superior service. The brand is synonymous with offerings like:
- 6E Prime: Priority seating, check-in, and complimentary onboard perks.
- 6E Flex: Unlimited rescheduling and cancellation benefits.
- 6E Add-ons: Customizable services like extra baggage allowance and pre-booked meals.
The airline’s investment in the “6E” branding extends beyond services; it is legally fortified. IndiGo registered the trademark “6E Link” under multiple categories in 2015, including:
- Class 9: Advertising displays and illuminated signs.
- Class 35: Online and television advertising services.
- Class 39: Transport of passengers and goods.
- Class 16: Printed advertising materials.
This wide-ranging trademark protection underscores the importance IndiGo places on safeguarding its brand.
Mahindra’s Perspective
Mahindra Electric’s foray into the electric vehicle market with the Mahindra BE 6E has garnered attention for its futuristic design and advanced technology. On November 25, 2024, the Registrar of Trademarks provisionally accepted Mahindra’s application to register the mark “BE 6E” under Class 12, which pertains to motor vehicles and their components. If finalized, this would allow Mahindra to use the mark for a broad range of vehicles, excluding motorcycles and mopeds.
Despite the fanfare surrounding the car’s unveiling, Mahindra now finds itself in the crosshairs of IndiGo’s legal team. The automaker argues that the branding of its car is unrelated to IndiGo’s services and falls within a distinct product category.
Legal and Branding Implications
The case raises fundamental questions about trademark law, particularly the overlap between industries. While IndiGo operates in the aviation sector, its registered trademarks encompass a wide array of services and products. This raises the issue of “likelihood of confusion”—a core principle in trademark disputes.
IndiGo contends that the use of “6E” by Mahindra dilutes its brand identity and could mislead consumers. On the other hand, Mahindra may argue that its use of the mark is unrelated to IndiGo’s airline services and does not create market confusion.
What Lies Ahead
The December 9 hearing promises to be a critical juncture in this legal battle. Industry experts anticipate that the case could set a precedent for cross-industry trademark disputes, especially as companies increasingly diversify their portfolios.
As the courtroom drama unfolds, one thing is certain: the stakes are high for both parties. While IndiGo fights to protect a brand it has built over years, Mahindra Electric aims to make its mark in the competitive EV market. The resolution of this dispute will not only affect these two giants but could also reshape the broader landscape of trademark law.
Stay tuned for updates on this high-stakes legal battle as two titans of Indian industry fight for control over “6E.”
Case Details: CS(COMM) 1073/2024; INTERGLOBE AVIATION LIMITED (INDIGO) Vs. MAHINDRA ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILE LIMITED & ANR.
For expert advice on handling trademark infringement, reach out to LexIndia IP Solutions. We’re here to help you safeguard your brand.
